ગુજરાતી સાહિત્યવિવેચનમાં તત્ત્વવિચાર/નિકષરેખા – વિશ્વનાથ ભટ્ટ, 1898: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SetTitle}} | {{SetTitle}} | ||
{ | {|style="background-color: ; border: ;" | ||
[[File:12. Vishvanath bhatt.jpg | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 1px;" | [[File:12. Vishvanath bhatt.jpg|150px]] | ||
< | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em; vertical-align: top;" |{{gap|0.5em}}{{xx-larger|'''૧૨'''}} | ||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: bottom; padding: 0px;" |{{gap|1em}}{{xx-larger|વિશ્વનાથ ભટ્ટ}}<br>{{gap|1em}}(૨૦.૩.૧૮૯૮ – ૨૭.૧.૧૯૬૮) | |||
|} | |||
{{dhr|2em}} | |||
{{સ-મ|'''{{larger|નિકષરેખા}}'''}} | |||
{{dhr|1em}} | |||
{{Poem2Open}} | {{Poem2Open}} | ||
Literary criticism can be no more than a reasoned account of the feeling produced upon the critic by the book he is criticizing. Critiscim can never be a science: it is, in the first place, much too personal, and in the second, it is concerned with values that science ignores. The touch-stone is emotion, not reason, We judge a work of art by its effect on our sincere and vital emotion, and nothing else. | Literary criticism can be no more than a reasoned account of the feeling produced upon the critic by the book he is criticizing. Critiscim can never be a science: it is, in the first place, much too personal, and in the second, it is concerned with values that science ignores. The touch-stone is emotion, not reason, We judge a work of art by its effect on our sincere and vital emotion, and nothing else. | ||