ગુજરાતી સાહિત્યવિવેચનમાં તત્ત્વવિચાર/નિકષરેખા – વિશ્વનાથ ભટ્ટ, 1898: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SetTitle}}
{{SetTitle}}


{{Heading| 12. વિશ્વનાથ ભટ્ટ | (20.3.1898 27.1.1968)}}
{|style="background-color: ; border: ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 1px;" | [[File:12. Vishvanath bhatt.jpg|150px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em; vertical-align: top;" |{{gap|0.5em}}{{xx-larger|'''૧૨'''}}
|-
|style="vertical-align: bottom; padding: 0px;" |{{gap|1em}}{{xx-larger|વિશ્વનાથ ભટ્ટ}}<br>{{gap|1em}}(૨૦..૧૮૯૮ ૨૭..૧૯૬૮)
|}
{{dhr|2em}}
{{color|LightSeaGreen|{{સ-મ|'''{{larger|નિકષરેખા}}'''}}}}
{{dhr|1em}}


<center>  '''નિકષરેખા''' </center>
{{Poem2Open}}
{{Poem2Open}}
Literary criticism can be no more than a reasoned account of the feeling produced upon the critic by the book he is criticizing. Critiscim can never be a science: it is, in the first place, much too personal, and in the second, it is concerned with values that science ignores. The touch-stone is emotion, not reason, We judge a work of art by its effect on our sincere and vital emotion, and nothing else.
Literary criticism can be no more than a reasoned account of the feeling produced upon the critic by the book he is criticizing. Critiscim can never be a science: it is, in the first place, much too personal, and in the second, it is concerned with values that science ignores. The touch-stone is emotion, not reason, We judge a work of art by its effect on our sincere and vital emotion, and nothing else.
17,546

edits